Wednesday, May 7, 2014

default choices kill people

" There are two main methods for determining voluntary consent: "opt in" (only those who have given explicit consent are donors) and "opt out" (anyone who has not refused is a donor). Opt-out legislative systems dramatically increase effective rates of consent for donation (the so-called default effect).[1] For example, Germany, which uses an opt-in system, has an organ donation consent rate of 12% among its population, while Austria, a country with a very similar culture and economic development, but which uses an opt-out system, has a consent rate of 99.98%.[1][2] "
From wikipedia
-
References[edit]
  1. Jump up to:a b Johnson, Eric J.; and Goldstein, Daniel G. "Do defaults save lives?" (PDF). Science 302 (5649): 1338–1339.doi:10.1126/science.1091721PMID 14631022. Retrieved 2012-05-19.
  2. Jump up^ Thaler, Richard H. (September 26, 2009). "Opting in vs. Opting Out"The New York TimesArchived from the original on March 8, 2014. Retrieved March 7, 2014.

Saturday, April 26, 2014

physiological not social

The problems of North American aboriginals (Nai's) can be summed up in one word, unskilled. To achieve wealth ,on average, a population here must have skills. However skills are mostly correlated to IQ. Tis better ,skill wise, to have a high IQ and come from a broken home than a low IQ and a good home in this society. It is difficult to get a low IQ'ed group to pass tests which are often not designed for a low IQ group. It is similar to asking a group short legged people to  out run a group of long legged people. Why conjectured low IQ'ed? Diet. A group of people who have evolved on a mainly omega 3 meaty diet up to as little as 500 years ago, some less, are now switched to a mainly processed carbohydrate diet. The result is certainly diabetes but why IQ? -http://www.nature.com/pr/journal/v63/n3/full/pr200860a.html#tbl1- shows a variation in verbal IQ with a slight change in diet to a group who has eaten far less a variation than the Nai's. Certainly there are other issues, brought on by despicable, misled and idiotic actions but I conjecture this as the biggest.

activist

The American Association for the Advancement of Science says biotechnology is safe. The French Academy of Science agrees: "All criticism against GMOs can largely be rejected on strictly scientific criteria." The national science academies of Germany, Brazil, India, China as well as Britain’s Royal Society share the same view. And the World Health Organization (WHO) States: "No effects of human health problems have been shown as a result of the consumption of GM foods..."

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

no oppression

Just because millionaires are in a room with billionaires, its still doesn't make the millionaires oppressed.

Saturday, September 14, 2013

Dishonesty, methinks, pays more than honesty.

Dishonesty is oft more lucrative than honesty.
Dishonesty ,unfortunately, is oft  more lucrative than dishonesty.

Saturday, September 7, 2013

iq question

W hat day is it today? if "The day before the day before yesterday is 3 days after Saturday, = "The day before the day before yesterday is Tuesday"
1) hence ...yesterday is Tuesday. =...Wednesday hence "The day before the day before Wednesday "but ...the day before Wednesday = Tuesday hence "The day before Tuesday" = Monday.
2) OR ...the day before yesterday= 2 days ago hence  'The day before 2 days ago is Tuesday " hence ...2 days ago is Tuesday =Thursday hence "The day before Thursday"  = Wednesday
3) OR The day before...=yesterday=1 day previous hence "Yesterday yesterday yesterday is Tuesday" = "3 days previous is Tuesday" =Friday (correct answer me thinks)
It appears if one takes out "is" ( shan't it have read, "The day before the day before yesterday WAS three days after Saturday. what day is it today?") the answer changes.  eg. from 1) ...the day before Wednesday = Tuesday is true BUT ...the day before "was/is" Wednesday=Tuesday is false.
So 1) changes to "The day before the day before was Wednesday " and  "...the day before was Wednesday =was Thursday hence "The day before was Thursday" = was Friday.

Tuesday, August 20, 2013

Over medicinized in N.A. 2010 A.D.



The science of medicine should find chemicals that should promote longevity and decrease misery.
For society, increasing one's life may not be good economically but decreasing one's misery helps by at least lessening the spread of the misery to others in society. However, it is a tenet in society to keep one alive as long as possible (without life support) ie life supersedes economics, happiness etc. Society's view on misery is not as high on the scale. Society would prefer one doesn't suffer but will tolerate one's suffering over the possible decrease in one's life.
The idealized pharmacy would dispense pills which would increase life and/or decrease misery, and educate on proper use of the pill. However, most pharmacies are not ideal. Their main objective is to sell as many pills as possible.Mostly corporations are in the medicine business. Corporations objectives are to make profits. Although the science of medicine can and does achieve this objective, this is not the only way to get people to takes pills. Herein lies the over medication of the masses.
The corporate pillmakers, through the guise of science, have skewed the data such that in is difficult to know the truth of the pills. The main tools they have used and continue to use to encourage pill usage include i) burying data ii) buying influential people in the medical field through a quid pro quo system iii) advertising to a gullible public. iv) advanced statistics. v) creating new diseases and/or lowering parameters of what is considered a disease. The gov't has set up what the pillmakers can/can't say but they are under staffed, lazy and under paid. There is little incentive to be a hero.
Through these methods, the pill prescriber will give the taker what the pill maker has created. It is pleasant for the pill prescriber to go with the zeitgeist and painful to go against. Again, there is little incentive to be a hero. The only resistance to this pill pushing machine is patent expirations, gov't's affordability to pay, insurance unwillingness to pay, etc.
Even if the pill making companies were to step aside, pill prescribers and pharmacies are a capitation business. The prescriber ensures repeat business by giving pills. The pharmacy, too, can only exist if people are taking pills. There is no negative feedback. In fact the more pills the better.